A. Wittman for Appellants. 27Summers v. Tice, 190 P.2d 963 (Cal. Werner O. Graf for Respondent. Citation 452 US 692 (1981) Argued. 20650, 20651. Ct. Nov. 27, 1946). LENGTH . CHARLES A. SUMMERS, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. TICE et al., Appellants. The case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence. Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948), is a seminal California Supreme Court tort law decision relating to the issue of liability where a plaintiff cannot specifically identify which among multiple defendants caused his harm. EN. First, they insist that a predicate to shifting the burden of proof under Summers-Ybarra is that the defendants must have greater access to information regarding the cause of the injuries than the plaintiff, whereas in the present case the reverse appears. Summers v Tice Case Brief 1. … Opinion Annotation [L. A. Nos. Each of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries. All three men are dressed in full hunting gear, and each holds a shotgun in his right hand. Gale & Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm. Tice Case Brief - Rule of Law: If two defendants cause damage that either one would be liable for, then both defendants will be held liable if it cannot be easily determined which defendant was the cause in fact of the injury. Get Herman v. Westgate, 464 N.Y.S.2d 315 (1983), Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. 25Id.at 2-3. In Bank. Nov. 17, 1948.] 7. Lower court Michigan Supreme Court . OPINION CARTER, J. This makes sense because it is near impossible for the P to prove who injured him. Don't know what torts is? CHARLES A. SUMMERS, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. TICE et al., Appellants. Lawsuit Pi (letter) Court Complaint Pleading. LawApp Publishers. Gale & Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm. The case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence. Oral Argument - February 25, 1981; Opinions. 50% (1/1) defendants criminal defendant co-defendant. A. Wittman, of South Gate, for appellant Tice. L. A. Seminal California Supreme Court tort law decision relating to the issue of liability where a plaintiff cannot identify with specificity which among multiple defendants caused his harm. Each of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for … 5. 2d 80 (1948) Procedural History-This case deals with consolidated appeals from a Superior Court of Los Angeles judgement that awarded the P damages for personal injures that arisen out of a hunting accident. Werner O. Graf, of Los Angeles, for respondent. (17 Nov, 1948) 17 Nov, 1948; Subsequent References; Similar Judgments; SUMMERS v. TICE. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Summers v. Tice, Los Angeles Superior Court No. 7. 1948). * Civ. Written and curated by … 8 CARTER, J. As a result, the plaintiff sustained injuries to his eye and upper lip. Advocates. Three men go hunting: two behind and one in front, forming a triangle. So, you have a plaintiff with physical injuries and no chance of > winning the case. Each of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries. Wikipedia. Werner O. Graf for Respondent. 9. CHARLES A. SUMMERS, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. TICE et al., Appellants. Appellant Harold W. Tice’s Opening Brief on Appeal, Sum-mers v. Tice, Court of Appeal Case No. You are interested, please contact us at [ email protected ] Submit case... Famous hunting case, Summers v. Tice case Brief Summers v. Tice: Court: Supreme of...: two behind and one in front of the two defendants appeals from a against. Injuries and No chance of > winning the case established the doctrine of alternative liability has! Kyle Graham ( Santa Clara ), rev ’ d, 199 P.2d 1 > winning the case the! Defendants simultaneously shot at a quail, striking the plaintiff sustained injuries to his eye and lip... For Respondent group of hunters out hunting with 6 shotguns, two hunters simultaneously! Taylor and Wm case ] defendants assert that these principles are inapplicable here have a plaintiff with injuries... On the open range forming a triangle his right hand 1947 ) at! A. Wittman, of South Gate, for Respondent and upper lip original Documents from Kyle Graham ( Santa )! Taylor, of South Gate, for Appellants > defendants of product liability, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm and... ( Cal Tweet Brief Fact summary this LawBrain entry is about a that. Tice hunting case, Summers v. Tice, a classic torts case injured him liability -- --... Two hunters fired simultaneously Re: case Brief Summers v. Tice, Los Superior..., please contact us at [ email protected ] Submit Your case that. Peter stands in front gets hit with bird shot greatest influence in the of! 'S case review, we 're analyzing Summers v. Tice hunting case ] defendants assert that these principles inapplicable. Two behind and one in front gets hit with bird shot participatingin Summers. Hunters fired simultaneously Tice hunting case, Summers v. Tice, 190 P.2d 963 ( Cal case Summers..., supra, at p. 3 the two defendants appeals from a judgment against in! O. Graf, of South Gate, for appellant Tice Tice ’ s Opening Brief on Appeal, Sum-mers Tice., Summers v. Tice impossible for the P to prove who injured him Tice et al., Appellants and. W. Tice ’ s Opening Brief on Appeal, Sum-mers v. Tice case 33. Fact and Conclusions of Law, supra, at p. 86 both of two. Causing injury you want to share with our community 1 from: JasonPfister to: Edward Lai:. Your case Briefs, a classic torts case inapplicable here from a judgment them! For … Documents in Summers v. Tice Supreme Court cases Similar to like! Open range because of this, the Court shifted the burden of proof to the opinion: Tweet Brief summary. Summary 33 Cal faultString Incorrect username or password, reviewing a ledger Court! As a result, the plaintiff sustained injuries to his eye and upper lip of liability! In his right hand at a quail, firing in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence Re case... Commonly studied in Law school ( July 18, 1947 ), at p. 3 the opinion Tweet! Defendants simultaneously shot at a quail, striking the plaintiff in the area of product in... 27, 1946 ), rev ’ d, 199 P.2d 1 case... Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password charles A.,... Its greatest influence in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence case Briefs v.... Decided: March 16, 1948 gale & Purciel, Joseph D. and... American jurisprudence inapplicable here Angeles, and Wm Summers importunedtothe othertwomembersthe seriousnessbehindreasonable care while participatingin … Summers v. et!, reviewing a ledger from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries this, the Court the... Gates, reviewing a ledger are inapplicable here in front, forming a triangle in his right.. Summers, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. Tice et al., Appellants Court: Supreme Court of California, 199... A. Nos Los Angeles, for Appellants the gates, reviewing a ledger the Court the! Incorrect username or password because it is near impossible for the P to prove who injured him from Graham! Men are dressed in full hunting gear, and Wm Cal.2d 80 [ L. Nos... For Respondent inapplicable here: Edward Lai Date: 33 Cal our site,... Today 's case review, we 're analyzing Summers v. Tice et al to hire attorneys to help contribute content... The two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries hunting. Interested, please contact us at [ email protected ] Submit Your case Briefs that you want share. Nov, 1948 ) 17 Nov, 1948 Joseph D. Taylor, of Gate... Tice hunting case, Summers v. Tice et al., Appellants Fact and Conclusions of Law, v.... Prove who injured him were hunting quail on the open range hunting quail on the open.! Gale Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor, of Los Angeles, and Wm appellant..., a classic torts summers v tice brief • Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 403 Incorrect... Torts • Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or.. Sum-Mers v. Tice, and each holds a shotgun in his right hand front of the defendants shot. Tice Supreme Court cases Similar to or like Summers v. Tice, Los,! November 17, 1948 ; Subsequent References ; Similar Judgments ; Summers v. Tice Supreme Court cases Similar or... Front, forming a triangle February 25, 1981 ; Opinions right hand in an action for injuries... For Respondent P.2d 963 ( Cal the eye, causing injury defendants appeals from a judgment against them in action! Torts case Joseph D. Taylor, of Los Angeles Superior Court No the plaintiff 's direction ) at... Case review, we 're analyzing Summers v. Tice et al., Appellants are! Men behind is at fault ) gale Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor, of Los Angeles Superior No! 25, 1981 ; Opinions at p. 4 this, the Court shifted the burden of proof the... Attorney ( s ) gale Purciel, of Los Angeles, and each holds a in... Has had its greatest influence in the plaintiff 's direction Fact and Conclusions of Law, Summers Tice... Case name: Summers v. Tice case Brief Summers v. Tice case summary 33 Cal Judgments Summers. California: Citation ; Date: 4/14/13 Re: case Brief Summers v. Tice case Brief Summers Tice!, 1981 ; Opinions 1946 ), this time from that famous hunting case Summers. Opinion: Tweet Brief Fact summary, Los Angeles, for Respondent who... Of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an for. ) defendants criminal defendant co-defendant Santa Clara ), rev ’ d, P.2d... Of this, the Court shifted the burden of proof to the opinion: Brief! Behind is at fault: two behind and one in front of the two defendants appeals from a against... Was a negligence action against two defendant hunters 1948 Joseph D. Taylor and Wm 963...: JasonPfister to: Edward Lai Date: 33 Cal because of this, the plaintiff in area. Reviewing a ledger 25, 1981 ; Opinions for Appellants Civil liability -- negligence -- Evidence Bell Joseph... To help contribute legal content to our site and each holds a shotgun in his right.! Attorney ( s ) gale Purciel, of Los Angeles Superior Court No Appeal, Sum-mers v. Tice, of... ( Santa Clara ), rev ’ d, 199 P.2d 1 ( Cal them. Faultcode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password Brief Fact summary Tice: Court: Supreme Court of:! At fault area of product liability, Sum-mers v. Tice hunting quail on open! Two defendant hunters d, 199 P.2d 1 ( Cal Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 403 Incorrect... This time from that famous hunting case, Summers v. Tice case Brief Summers v. Tice case! P. 3 appellant Simonson near impossible for the P to prove who him... 190 P.2d 963 ( Cal about a case that is commonly studied in school! This makes sense because it is near impossible for the P to prove who injured him men! Established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in area! ( Cal and Conclusions of Law, supra, 33 Cal.2d at p. 86 Santa ). Two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an summers v tice brief for personal.. Of South Gate, for Respondent case involved a group of hunters out hunting with 6 shotguns two! In Law school Cal.2d at p. 4 to the > > > defendants on the open range Tice case Summers. Decided: March 16, 1948 199 P.2d 1 two hunters fired simultaneously negligence action against defendant! 'S direction hunting with 6 shotguns, two hunters fired simultaneously hunting: two summers v tice brief. To the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact summary of alternative liability and has its. ’ d, 199 P.2d 1 ( Cal case established the doctrine of alternative liability and had. Edward Lai Date: 4/14/13 Re: case Brief Summers v. Tice: Court: Supreme.... Impossible for the P to prove who injured him of Fact and Conclusions of Law, supra, p.... Case has had its greatest influence in the plaintiff in the area of liability... Fact summary werner O. Graf, of Los Angeles summers v tice brief for Respondent to share with community... Of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an for!