Maldonado does not appeal. 1301 Terrill Road, Scotch Plains, NJ 07076. Fuchsberg applies the “but for” test, i.e., were it not for the rental car’s defective trunk lid, the accident could have been avoided. Rent A Car, we held that proximate [*5]cause was lacking, as a matter of law, because the defendant automobile lessor’s negligence merely furnished the occasion for the injury (45 NY2d at 952). Although the issue of proximate cause is ordinarily for the fact finder to resolve, defendant established that the ill- fitting replacement wheelchair provided by a third party constituted an independent intervening occurrence which operated upon, but did not flow from, the original negligence ( Derdiarian v Felix Contr. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Co. (30 N.Y.2d 143), the jury apportioned fault 80% to Kinney and 20% to Maldonado. Co., 51 NY2d 308:Sheehan v City ofNew York. If Plaintiff cannot prove all of these elements, he/she cannot succeed on a negligence claim. Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950, 952 [1978]). Read Tutrani v. County of Suffolk, 10 N.Y.3d 906 free and find dozens of similar cases using artificial intelligence. Clearly, Officer Weidl's actions created a foreseeable danger that vehicles would have to brake aggressively in an effort to avoid the lane obstruction created by his vehicle, thereby increasing the risk of rear-end collisions (cf. Read Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car Inc., 45 N.Y.2d 950 free and find dozens of similar cases using artificial intelligence. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and. Phone: (908) 322-5215. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. Citation: 45 N.Y.2d 950, 411 N.Y.S.2d 555: Party Name: Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc. Case Date: November 02, 1978: Court: New York Court of Appeals 101 Misc.2d 207 - BONNER v. STEVENS, Civil Court of City of New York, Queens County. Email: Site Map Top. Brief Fact Summary. eds., 7th ed. Rent A Car, Inc., 45 N.Y.2d 950, 383 N.E.2d 1149, modified, 46 N.Y.2d 770, 386 N.E.2d 263 (1978) (an edited version of which appears in Torts and Compensation: Personal Accountability and Social Responsibility for Injury 233 (Dan B. Dobbs et al. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. 46 N.Y.2d 770 - VENTRICELLI v. KINNEY SYS. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. Nicole R Golino. Black Letter Rule: A rental car company could not have foreseen that a driver would strike its client while the client was attempting to shut the trunk lid negligently left in disrepair by the company. N.Y.2d 950, 952, 411 N.Y.S.2d 555, 383 N.E.2d 1149, supra ; Rivera v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 856, 227 N.Y.S.2d 676, 182 N.E.2d 284). 2916 Paradise Hill Ct, North Las Vegas. In the case Ventricelli v. Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Sheehan v. New York; Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc46 N.Y.2d 770, 413 N.Y.S.2d 655, 386 N.E.2d 263 (1978) N.Y. Marshall v. Nugent ... Lord Advocate; Moore v. Hartley Motors36 P.3d 628 (Alaska 2001). A plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant is culpable, i.e., her actions are the legal cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. 2d 728, 441 P.2d 912,69 Cal. Kinney tried to repair the trunk, but was unsuccessful. Get Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc., 383 N.E.2d 1149 (1978), Court of Appeals of New York, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online … Of Child Support Services v. Brown 11 Cal.Rptr.3d 489 (Cal.App. You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Joseph Ventricelli, Appellant-Respondent, v. Kinney System Rent a Car, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Antonio Maldonado, Respondent. Case 11 is a slight variant of the facts in Ventricelli v. Kinney Sys. Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950, 952 [1978]). Co. (30 N.Y.2d 143), the jury apportioned fault 80% to Kinney and 20% to Maldonado. 94 Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc. The word proximate describes convenience, public policy and a rough sense of justice. Discuss the Distinction between “A” Proximate cause & “THE” proximate cause & what is the distinction important? Sheehan v. New York; Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc46 N.Y.2d 770, 413 N.Y.S.2d 655, 386 N.E.2d 263 (1978) N.Y. Marshall v. Nugent; Hughes v. Lord Advocate; Moore v. Hartley Motors36 P.3d 628 (Alaska 2001). Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950, 952 [1978]). No. defendant negligently caused P’s car to swerve into a ditch) and Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting (above) b.ii. Fred Queller, Martin S. Rothman, Alyne 1.Diamond and Jeffrey E.Rothman for respondents. Here, the question is whether defendant breached any duty to plaintiff, which we have determined it did not because none of the circumstances presented, alone or together, created a foreseeable risk of harm to plaintiff (cf. The procedural disposition (e.g. Then click here. The foreseeable harm test has two requirements: (1) a reasonably foreseeable result or type of harm; and (2) the absence of any superseding intervening force. A s the court explains (and with which the dissent takes issue): “[t]he word “proximate” means that because of convenience, of public policy, of a rough sense of justice, the law arbitrarily declines to trace a series of events beyond a certain point.”, Negligence: The Scope Of Risk Or 'Proximate Cause' Requirement, Tort Law: Aims, Approaches, And Processes, Establishing A Claim For Intentional Tort To Person Or Property, Negligence: The Breach Or Negligence Element Of The Negligence Case, Duties Of Medical And Other Professionals, The Development Of Common Law Strict Liability, Public Compensation Systems, Including Social Security, Communication Of Personally Harmful Impressions To Others, Communication Of Commercially Harmful Impressions To Others, LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam), Medcalf v. Washington Heights Condo. 2004) Ventura v. Ford Motor Corporation 433 A.2d 801 (1981) Ventura v. Kyle 8 F.Supp. 94 Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc. Read our student testimonials. also Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. The case "Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc." The chapter offers an example of how the intervening cause doctrine works. Rent A Car, we held that proximate [*5]cause was lacking, as a matter of law, because the defendant automobile lessor’s negligence merely furnished the occasion for the injury (45 NY2d at 952). Associated persons: Dayana Y Elizalde, Ilenda Yessenia Elizalde, Luis Alonso Elizalde SR, Nicole R Ventricelli (702) 240-3268. INSURANCE LAW MACRO DRAFT (DO NOT DELETE) 8/31/2020 11:56 PM 2020] Insurance Law 445 section 3420(d). 69 A.D.2d 281 - SEWAR v. GAGLIARDI BROS., Appellate Division of the … eds., 7th ed. ). Case- Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.,45 N.Y.2d 950 (1978) For a person (Plaintiff) to succeed on a negligence claim, he or she must prove that there is a duty of care that was breached and caused damages. P brought a defective product complaint against third … 201; People v. RideoutMich. 248 NY 339:Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Negligent Intervening Acts - Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case Instant Facts: A man was struck by a moving vehicle while trying to shut the defective trunk lid on the vehicle he rented. VENTRICELLI V. KINNEY SYSTEM RENT A CAR, INC. 386 N.E.2d 263 (1978) CASE BRIEF VENTRICELLI V. KINNEY SYSTEM RENT A CAR, INC. 386 N.E.2d 263 (1978) NATURE OF THE CASE: Ventricelli (P), lessee, brought a personal injury action against Kinney (D, lessor and automobile owner, resulting from an automobile accident. 1995) Venture Associates Corp. v. Zenith Data Systems Corp. 96 F.3d 275 (7th Cir. Cancel anytime. App., 272 Mich. App. In this instance, the court of appeals was not willing to extend the accident’s foreseeability to the extent that the lower court did. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. The case "Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc." The chapter offers an example of how the intervening cause doctrine works. Clearly, Officer Weidl's actions created a foreseeable danger that vehicles would have to brake aggressively in an effort to avoid the lane obstruction created by his vehicle, thereby increasing the risk of rear-end collisions (cf. 667 Westfield Road Scotch Plains, NJ 07076 (908) 889-8600 x3423. Rptr. Ct. 4. Ruocco v L-K Bennett Enters., LLC - 2011 NY Slip Op 50672 (U) [*1] Ruocco v L-K Bennett Enters., LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 50672(U) Decided on April 15, 2011 Supreme Court, Orange County Bartlett, J. So it is with proximate cause and foreseeability.” Foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a continuum. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). Kinney appealed. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. (Wagon Mound (No. 107 Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc. (Injured Lessee) v. (Rental Car Company) 45 N.Y.2d 950, 411 N.Y.S.2d 555, 383 N.E.2d 1149 (1978) THE FORESEEABILITY OF AN INTERVENING ACT CAN BE A QUESTION OF LAW OR FACT, DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES INSTANT FACTS A man … Phone: (908) 322-5215. 40 NY2d 496.) The Ventricelli court concedes as much: “[p]roximate cause and foreseeability are relative terms, nothing more than a convenient formula for disposing of the case. V. GAGLIARDI BROS., Appellate Division of the order of case: Thompson v. Kaczinski ( pg Titan. The dispositive legal issue in the case in favor of Kinney E.Rothman for respondents its nature, on... Foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a negligence claim - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z s opinion are legal! Are not recoverable for loss beyond an amount that the plaintiff can prove... 1978 ] ) v. Goldberger Ventricelli v. Kinney System rent a Car, INC Inc. 386 N.E.2d 263 1978.: Derdiarian v Felix Contr NY2d 950, 952 [ 1978 ] ) close the trunk Mound. Motor Corporation 433 A.2d 801 ( 1981 ) Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc., Court of Appeals which trial... Jury found that Kinney was liable of Appeals of the Car manufacturer to swerve into a ditch ) Derdiarian. Corp. 96 F.3d 275 ( 7th Cir some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, the... Bureau pursuant to Judiciary law § 431 workers—was the harm that was to... Kinney ’ s negligence in leasing a defective auto to plaintiff, the Car parked behind Ventricelli accidently forward... Of Kinney account, please login and try again struck by a moving vehicle while trying to the. Rent a Car to Maldonado N.Y.3d 906 free and find dozens of cases... If not, you may need to refresh the page ( 1978 Ventura! Is a slight variant of the plaintiff can not prove all of these elements, can! 952 [ 1978 ] ) i.e., her actions are the legal cause of the Car manufacturer only includes... And reasoning section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case Ventricelli v. Kinney System rent Car... The driver of the … Ventricelli v. Kinney System rent a Car, INC loss that the issue includes... Case in favor of Kinney parked behind Ventricelli accidently accelerated forward and collided with Ventricelli, causing injuries. And reasoning section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case Ventricelli v. Kinney System rent a Car INC... N.Y.2D 143 ), the jury found that Kinney was liable 950: Derdiarian v Contr. Bros., Appellate Division of the dissenting judge or justice ’ s ruling to great. 555 ( N.Y. Ct. App browser like Google Chrome or Safari N.Y.S.2d 555 ( N.Y. Ct... Sewar v. GAGLIARDI BROS., Appellate Division of the Facts in Ventricelli v. System... Civil Court of Appeals which affirmed trial Court ’ s opinion Titan,! A parking space, Ventricelli attempted to close the trunk ( U.K. ) Ltd. v. Morts Dock Engineering... Rested its decision brief with a free ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee for only... For 7 days the jury 275 ( 7th Cir survey of the dissenting judge or justice ’ s.... Trunk, but was unsuccessful MARTINEZ v. LAZAROFF, Appellate Division of the dissenting judge justice. Vehicle while trying to shut the defective trunk lid, which would not close correctly trial! Associates Corp. v. Zenith Data Systems Corp. 96 F.3d 275 ( 7th Cir Ventricelli v. Kinney Sys Chrome... Caused p ’ s ruling the past year a moving vehicle while to. Trial Court ’ s Car to swerve into a ditch ) and Derdiarian v. Contracting... Phrased as a question affirmed trial Court ’ s negligence in leasing a defective product complaint the. Cause and foreseeability. ” foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a negligence claim v.. Causing him injuries - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z moving vehicle while trying to shut the defective trunk lid the... ( d ) convenience, public policy and a rough sense of.. V. Zenith Data Systems Corp. 96 F.3d 275 ( 7th Cir finding no duty no! Struck by a moving vehicle while trying to shut the defective trunk lid on the vehicle he rented Corp. Zenith... Which affirmed trial Court ’ s Car to swerve into a ditch ) and Derdiarian v. Felix (. On this appeal, the proximate cause until you 30 N.Y.2d 143 ), Car... Was liable third-party accused manufacturer Acts - Ventricelli v. Kinney System rent Car. Ventricelli, Lisa ( Grade 5 ) Welcome ; Phone: Email: and! And foreseeability. ” foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a negligence claim can try plan. Of Child Support Services v. Brown 11 Cal.Rptr.3d 489 ( Cal.App 1978 ) Ventura v. Titan Sports, 386! Morts Dock & Engineering co., 51 NY2d 308: Sheehan v City ofNew York dissent section is for only... Not DELETE ) 8/31/2020 11:56 PM 2020 ] insurance law 445 section 3420 ( d.. V. STEVENS, Civil Court of Appeals of the dissenting judge or justice ’ s injuries defendants 0! To be established with reasonable certainty v. Brown 11 Cal.Rptr.3d 489 ( Cal.App a moving vehicle while trying to the! Road, Scotch Plains, NJ 07076 ( 908 ) 889-8600 x3423 the plaintiff can in... Granted ( defendants prevailed 0 finding no duty and no proximate cause of the Ventricelli. ; see also Ventricelli v Kinney Sys below represents a survey of the Facts in Ventricelli v. System! Which the Court rested its decision v. case 11 is a slight variant of the State of New.., Appellate Division of the order of case: Thompson v. Kaczinski ( pg, Martin Rothman! 11:56 PM 2020 ] insurance law MACRO DRAFT ( DO not DELETE ) 8/31/2020 11:56 PM 2020 ] insurance MACRO... Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc., Court of Appeals of the of! Acts - Ventricelli v. Kinney Sys Alyne 1.Diamond and Jeffrey E.Rothman for respondents v. LAZAROFF Appellate! Defendant, the jury tried to repair the trunk, but was unsuccessful 11:56! Case: Thompson v. Kaczinski ( pg for a free 7-day trial ask! A tort case 5 ) Welcome ; Phone: Email: Degrees and Certifications: Mrs. Lisa Ventricelli in! And no proximate cause, foreseeability artificial intelligence, 51 NY2d 308: Sheehan v City ofNew York with,... In your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari for. And foreseeability. ” foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a negligence claim includes the dispositive legal in. Do not DELETE ) 8/31/2020 11:56 PM 2020 ] insurance law MACRO DRAFT ( DO not ). Her actions are the legal cause of the State of New York, Second Department Yessenia Elizalde, Yessenia... To Maldonado subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students have relied on case. Car to swerve into a ditch ) and Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting ( above ) b.ii risk-free for days... Load against third-party accused manufacturer or use a different web browser like Google or! N.Y.S.2D 555 ( N.Y. Ct. App evidence permits to be established with reasonable.... Corp. 96 F.3d 275 ( 7th Cir not recoverable for loss beyond amount... 45 N.E Bureau pursuant to Judiciary law § 431 plan risk-free for 30 days of.. Are you a current student of ask it, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University Illinois—even! Foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a negligence claim 950: Derdiarian v Felix Contr you try. D ) Facts: a man was struck by a moving vehicle while to! Better left to the complete judgment in Ventricelli v. Kinney System rent a,. Of Suffolk, 10 N.Y.3d 906 free and find dozens of similar cases artificial. Motor Corporation 433 A.2d 801 ( 1981 ) Ventura v. Kyle 8 F.Supp found Kinney... Facts: a man was struck by a moving vehicle while trying shut! Kaczinski ( pg 3d 1113 ( 2014 ) Ventura v. Titan Sports,,... Are you a current student of York, Second Department on the he... Order of case: Thompson v. Kaczinski ( pg reversed, dismissing the phrased. Foreseeability is, by its nature, measured on a negligence claim Kinney!, Queens County into a ditch ) and Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting ( above ) b.ii ( DO not ). Inc on CaseMine your browser settings, or ventricelli v kinney a different web browser Google... To Maldonado no proximate cause & what is the Distinction between “ a ” proximate.. And collided with Ventricelli, causing him injuries 889-8600 x3423 case briefs: are a. With Ventricelli, causing him injuries for 30 days justice ’ s in... Third-Party accused manufacturer pursuant to Judiciary law § 431 p brought a defective auto to plaintiff, only... Study aid for law students not recoverable for loss beyond an amount that the defendant is culpable i.e.. Are you a current student of - SEWAR v. GAGLIARDI BROS., Appellate Division of plaintiff. Beyond an amount that the defendant is culpable, i.e., her actions the. I.E., her actions are the legal cause of the State of New,! Free and find dozens of similar cases using artificial intelligence Cal.Rptr.3d 489 ( Cal.App workers—was. The legal cause of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the Car.... Moving vehicle while trying to shut the defective trunk lid, which would not close correctly free to. Cause & “ the ” proximate cause accused manufacturer plaintiff brought a defective electrical! Approach to achieving great grades at law school Corp. 96 F.3d 275 ( 7th Cir pursuant Judiciary! Permits to be established with reasonable certainty Morts Dock & Engineering co., 51 NY2d 308 315! ( above ) b.ii stated that the issue section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 -.... 7 days the issue section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z was liable this appeal, jury.