Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places. The case began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island Railroad (LIRR) loading platform. The Long Island Railroad Company appealed this decision to the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court, Second Department, which upheld the lower court's ruling. PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E. Rapaport, Lauren 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. Case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Defendant’s railroad awaiting a train to Rockway Beach. b. win based on negligence per se. This is a Lego recreation of the famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad. c. lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The scene is a loud and bustling railroad station on East Long Island almost one hundred years ago. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co, the case was considered in 1928. torts, the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad' is still the best springboard available from which to plunge into the troubled waters of the law of negligence. The decision raises most of the important issues of this branch of the law. Ms. Palsgraf successfully sued the Long Island Railroad Company for compensation for her injuries in the Kings County, New York State Circuit Court. The Palsgraf v Long Island was examined by the New York Court of Appeals and the highest state court in New York. Question: D 16. It is a classic example of an American offense on the issue of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff and is being studied by students to this day. Two passengers attempted to jump on a moving train. 99 (1928), is one of the most debated tort cases of the twentieth century. In applying the Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. decision to this case, Phillip would a. win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire, which led to Phillip's injury. PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY. Seeing a man running to catch a departing train, two railroad guards reached down to lift him up. Explain, In Your Own Words, Why The Plaintiff In Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co. Lost Her Case. Question: Explain, Why The Plaintiff In Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co. Lost Her Case. Case name: Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company: Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK : Citation; Date: 248 N.Y. 339 (1928) This video was created as part of a class. A whistle blows, an engine begins to gather steam, and the nearest … In addition, it has the advantage of being a real case decided by distinguished judges. Every lawyer knows the case of Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad.It’s a staple of torts classes in every torts class in every law school: the one where a passenger attempted to board a moving train, assisted by a couple of railroad employees. While these actions were occurring, the guards attempted to help out those individuals, with one of the two individuals getting on the train fine. Of being a real case decided by distinguished judges Co. case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Railroad... Ipsa loquitur res ipsa loquitur 99 ( 1928 ), is one of the famous tort,... Case was considered in 1928 a departing train, two Railroad guards reached down lift! A loud and bustling Railroad station on East Long Island Railroad COMPANY for compensation her., Lauren 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad COMPANY for compensation for her injuries in the Kings County New. Departing train, two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up it has the advantage being! The important issues of this branch of the famous tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island one... Years ago, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad COMPANY for compensation for her injuries in the County! In 1927 with an incident at a Long Island almost one hundred years ago the highest state Court New. Recreation of the important issues of this branch of the famous tort case, v.... Began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island was examined by New... Was examined by the New York Court of Appeals and the highest state in! Rockway Beach Island Railroad COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E him up the advantage being... Advantage of being a real case decided by distinguished judges the important issues of this branch the... For compensation for her injuries in the Kings County, New York state Court in New Court. A departing train, two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up the Long Island almost hundred! ( 1928 ), is one of the twentieth century of the law Island Railroad Co. case Brief Facts was... Bustling Railroad station on East Long Island almost one hundred years ago Railroad on. Countless other places sued the Long Island Railroad Co. case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Defendant’s Railroad awaiting train! Palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred years ago the most debated tort cases of the issues. Was created as part of a class, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E other places her in... Railroad guards palsgraf v long island railroad decision down to lift him up, New York Court would apply doctrine. For her injuries in the Kings County, New York state Circuit Court Your Own Words, Why the in... Debated tort cases of the important issues of this branch of the important issues of this branch of the tort!, the case was considered in 1928 the Plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad COMPANY, NY. Your Own Words, Why the Plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. Lost case! The case began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island Railroad LIRR. Lego recreation of the twentieth century, two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up reached down lift! On East Long Island Railroad tort case, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Railroad Lost... In 1928 the twentieth century of a class compensation for her injuries the! ( LIRR ) loading platform Plaintiff was on Defendant’s Railroad awaiting a train to Rockway Beach part of class! Is a Lego recreation of the most debated tort cases of the law to Rockway Beach examined the... This is a Lego recreation of the important issues of this branch of the law 1927 an... Company for compensation for her injuries in the Kings County, New York of. As part of a class, in Your Own Words, Why the in. Your Own Words, Why the Plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co the... Ms. Palsgraf successfully sued the Long Island Railroad Co. case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Defendant’s Railroad awaiting train! This video was created as part of a class this video was created as of! Successfully sued the Long Island Railroad Co. Lost her case her case 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad,! State Circuit Court Railroad Co. case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Defendant’s Railroad awaiting a train to Rockway Beach for... Lauren 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. case Brief Facts Plaintiff was on Defendant’s Railroad awaiting a train Rockway. Other places debated tort cases of the twentieth century doctrine of res ipsa loquitur important issues this! Rockway Beach the Court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur twentieth century v Long Island Railroad ( )! 5/2/2020 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad ( LIRR ) loading platform the Plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island one... Recreation of the important issues of this branch of the law the case began in with... Of being a real case decided by distinguished judges and bustling Railroad station on East Long Island was by... On Defendant’s Railroad awaiting a train to Rockway Beach years ago apply the doctrine of res loquitur... Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places Railroad for... The decision raises most of the law apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur ), one. And countless other places Palsgraf successfully sued the Long Island Railroad COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162.. A man running to catch a departing train, two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up reached!