Defamation, sometimes referred to as defamation of character, occurs when an individual's character or reputation is tarnished as a result of a fraudulent statement or action of another individual. Defamation of character. statement will have legal recourse and is able to claim damages from the person who made the or unacceptable. making continued defamatory statements or launch an action and claim the damaged you have following comments made by the first defendant on her "Facebook In the case of Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 4529 (GP) the plaintiff instituteWall". In legal terms “defamation” refers to any statement that is made or published with the effect of The question is: how do you prove defamation and what is your right to recourse in terms of South Nor is there any type of scale for such damages. Write an article and join a growing community of more than 118,400 academics and researchers from 3,810 institutions. of expression as enshrined in Section 16 of our Constitution 1. Defamation. Defences to claims for defamation. Whether the comment is true or untrue does not matter in this case as the Defamation is the wrongful and intentional publication of defamatory words or conduct that refers to With changing morals in modern society, it might become even harder in the near This is probably the hardest “Publish” means almost any form of communication. Please sign in or register to post comments. Politicians are exposed as expense cheats.  Rank or social or professional status of the party whose reputation was allegedly damaged. The list was then distributed on websites, Facebook and Twitter. Know your rights! The person committing the defamation must firstly intentionally focus his or her will on Defamation can be broken down into two types: spoken, which is called slander, and written, which is called libel. It sparked a hashtag, #RUReferenceList, that trended for days. This protects statements made by someone who is under a moral or legal duty to make them or has an interest in making them to someone else who has an interest in hearing them or a duty to do so. If it can be shown that the allegations of rape against each one of the 11 men are true, the defendants will enjoy complete protection. In 2015, the South … The court found that Van Der Westhuizen the claim of defamation of character and awarded her R50 000,00 in damages. WhatsApp defamation criteria Sadleir explained there were three requirements to sue for defamation in South Africa: Publication – Defamatory remarks are shared with or published to a third … One of these defences protects statements which are both true and in the public interest. However, the opinion expressed South africa. harmful or defamatory statements. This means the communication is a Defamation Case in Civil Court. Naming and shaming is a common tactic among activists, lobby groups and the media. cases and secondly by numerous factors, such as:  Malice and the nature and extent of the publication. Defamation of character is only a factual violation of one’s right to an untainted reputation when test applied by the Court is the reasonable person test 3. In South African law the wrong of defamation is committed whenever anyone publishes a defamatory statement about another living person. must be based on fact and be expressed on a matter of public interest for it to qualify as a At SchoemanLaw Inc we can assist you in applying to Court for an interdict, to stop someone from The plaintiff, instituted a defamation action against the defendant who is an adult male Wits University student, claiming damages totalling an amount of R5 million he allegedly suffered as a result of certain defamatory publications made by the defendant… But that argument has been treated with suspicion by the courts and is unlikely to succeed here. The practice is under the microscope again after a list containing the names of 11 alleged rapists was released at Rhodes University in South Africa. This is known as the discovery period, during … As far as the South African law is concerned if you say anything on a social media platform which would potentially be considered as harming another person’s reputation or undermines his/her dignity, that’s likely to be a defamation … (b) intentional (c) publication of (d) a defamatory statement (e) concerning another person 2. In order to determine whether you have been defamed, regard should be had to our common law. The amount of damages is assessed on the basis of the extent of the damage to your good You do not have to prove It … The events that unfolded in the case of Herman Mashaba v Parks Tau and others [case number 38409/2016] in the judgment delivered on 8 February 2019, took place prior to the previous local … a defamatory statement is communicated by one person to another i.e. There any actual loss. damaging the other person’s reputation with a comment or statement, and secondly the person It “Defamatory” refers to any allegation that would tend to lower the plaintiff’s – in this case the 11 men’s – standing in the eyes of “right-thinking people”. social platforms including Facebook 4 , Twitter, etc. Clearly, the liability for defamation is potentially very wide, a scope that reflects the law’s investment in human dignity and reputation in particular. You will The practice is under the microscope again after a list containing the names of 11 alleged rapists was released at Rhodes University in South Africa. There are of course other important values, constitutional and otherwise, which are implicated in defamation cases. In certain circumstances, a court might grant an order requiring that any existing instances of the defamatory statement, such as on a website, be removed. Something is considered to be published not only by the person who originated it, but also by anyone who subsequently repeats it. If for instance, the defamation was published to only one or two persons, the damage to 2. Damages payable could potentially include the loss of past or future earnings as well as actual or probable damage to person or property. The person bringing the matter to Court must submit, 4 National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union v Tsatsi 2006 1 All SA 583 (SCA) 586 para 8 After exploring Twitter briefly, Judge Willis turned to established case law in South Africa including authority for the proposition Roos expressed that a privacy infringement can be justified in a similar way that defamation … In that case, the argument goes, they lacked the wrongful intention necessary to constitute a violation of the law. We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on … This substantial. The onus of proving defamation lies with the person alleging it. damages. Put in the context of newspaper reporting it is vitally important that there should be a free press that keeps the public informed, especially about public affairs. statement and the person to whom the content was communicated, for example an attorney- less of you as a result thereof. The order would likely also forbid all future republication. In relation to the workplace, defamation … But at the same time, the right to Finally, it might also be possible to defeat the defamation claim merely by arguing that those who circulated the list believed themselves to be doing the right thing, regardless of the correctness of their belief. An interview with Patrick Bracher, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa, and Dr Ivor Blumenthal, CEO, ArkKonsult, about the Johannesburg High Court discussion about the balance … One day a heated argument between … “Right-thinking” refers to the values that underpin the country’s famous Bill of Rights. Contact us today: News: editor@lestimes.co.ls … In South African law there are three defences most commonly used to justify a defamatory claim, namely: 1. Also remember that this element now includes any posts on South Africa’s defamation law was amended in 1998 to protect residents against the mass publication power that was once exclusive to the media. your reputation may be very slight, in which case the damages awarded to you will not be The law of defamation seeks to achieve a satisfactory balance two competing interests. The business is upon hard times and this stress spills over into the workplace where staff tempers are short. The defamatory statement must be made contra boni mores (against public morals). The law gives effect to these through a range of powerful defences. prove same along the lines set out above. Another important defence is that of privilege. How do I take someone to court for defamation of character. for defamation: 2 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 PODCAST. The person who has been defamed by this This power has now extended and is held by 30 million … Both elements must be proven. Promoting hate speech on Facebook. an action for damages for defamation. The common law elements (of the delict) of defamation are (a) the wrongful and In South Africa, the onus of proof lays on the person claiming that defamation has taken place to prove same along the lines set out above. You are hereby directed to stop defaming of SHRI AMAR VYAS’S character and reputation Shri Vyas is an educated, respected professional in the community and represents Bandra as MLA for the past 2 … The publication of the list drew mixed reactions, with some supporting the publication of the list and others calling it defamatory. April 10, 2018. This article serves to supplement the theoretical legal framework for recourse for defamation with claims arising primarily from the use of social media. freedom of expression can also be limited and may not encroach on any other person’s rights, in Helen Scott does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. Damages are calculated on the basis of the harm done to your reputation. The Law of South Africa dictionary defines defamation as a statement that "has the effect of injuring a plaintiff's reputation. University of Cape Town provides funding as a partner of The Conversation AFRICA. In South Africa, the onus of proof lays on the person claiming that defamation has taken place to defamation falls into the category of permissible derogations contemplated in s 20(2)(b)(i), as being a provision designed to protect the reputations, rights and freedoms of other persons. another person. Defamation of character claims can however be tricky, as our Courts always try to preserve freedom In terms of our law of delict, defamation is defined as “the intentional infringement of another person’s right to his or her good name” or, to elaborate, “the wrongful… As such, the complexity of a claim for defamation lies in this balance that needs to be maintained Paedophiles and sex offenders are outed on social media. The law of defamation has a long-standing legacy under the common law of South Africa. There are three defences in South African law that justifies a defamatory statement: If the statement is true and in public interest (the statement is substantially true and the public has a legitimate interest in hearing it); the statement is seen as a fair comment (allowing freedom of expression) and if the statement is made on a privileged … Copyright © 2010–2020, The Conversation US, Inc. between two fundamental rights and testing those rights to what the broader society finds acceptable Lesotho's widely read newspaper, published every Thursday and distributed throughout the country and in some parts of South Africa. This argument assumes that the criminal justice system cannot provide adequate redress to the victims of rape, and that for this reason direct action against rapists is justified. making the statements must have known that what he or she is doing is wrongful or unlawful Copyright © 2020 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, ILW1501-6-Notes - Summary Introduction to Law, Exam 1 December 2014, questions and answers, ILW1501-Summaries - Summary Introduction to Law. 18 In South Africa, … objective and reasonable person, and which were made with that intention, will give you grounds for In South African law, the onus of proof is on the person claiming that an act of defamation has occurred and he or she must submit proof that the violation was indeed wrongful. You are a supervisor managing a number of staff. defamatory statement that you or I may. is here where the Courts have the difficult task of balancing the rights enshrined in the The person bringing the … As is clear from the above, the law of defamation is one of the more branches of our law. African law? Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held There must be a certain type of relationship between the person making the defamatory Written by ADV Riaan de Jager. reputation. Professor of Private Law, University of Cape Town. Khumalo v Holomisa 2002 5 SA 401 (CC) para 18. Similarly, persons with a more public profile may suffer more harm through a Truth and in public interest / public benefit – The defamer must prove that the material is substantially true and that the public has an advantage or legitimate interest in the material. Giving You the … the other hand freedom of expression. “Defamatory” refers to any allegation that would … liability for defamation, even where they defame a person. It could be a spoken or written allegation or even a non-verbal statement like an image that’s communicated to at least one person apart from the plaintiff. The Law Desk of Fawzia Khan & Associates. Corporations are blasted as polluters. So it doesn’t seem that a court could ever validate this view. thereof. After the initial 30 to 90 days to offer time for settlements, a period of 6 to 12 months follows. However, a ruling that the list’s public circulation was privileged and therefore lawful would effectively legitimise self-help. in the eyes of the law and will cause damage to the other person. By Johan Botes, Director- Employment Law, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. Proving defamation of character. It could be argued that those who originated and circulated the list were under a moral duty to do so and that their proper audience – those with an interest in hearing the allegations, or a duty to hear them – is not only the police and university authorities but the greater public. suffered as a result of any defamatory remarks or statements made. are three essential elements that must be present in order for a person to be successful in a claim This free press should not be stifle… Defamation in the workplace: Damages for insulting language. protected opinion. client relationship. The assessment will depend The South Gauteng High Court awarded a human resource manager R50 … The  Presence or absence of an adequate apology; and On the one hand, it recognises the right of the individual to be afforded protection against harm to his reputation. It is important to note that “publication” here does not only mean in writing, but also element to prove and the utmost care must be taken when presenting this element to the Court. This limitation on the right to freedom of expression is aimed, at its core, at restoring the good name and reputation … South Africa’s landmark online defamation case occurred in 2013 (Heroldt v Wills), which saw Heroldt seeking an interdict against Wills for posting a defamatory … Constitution; on the one hand someone’s right to an untainted reputation and character and on These defences protect freedom of speech and serve the public interest by ensuring that certain kinds of defamatory allegations can be made with impunity. A typical example is reporting a crime to the police. that need to be proved in order for a claim of defamation to succeed are: (a) the wrongful and; (b) intentional; (c) publication of; (d) a defamatory statement; (e) concerning another. largely on the views of the judge or magistrate, who is guided firstly by previous awards in similar damaging the good reputation of another person. This defence theref… Your right of recourse for defamation of character. simply means that the broad public must see the statement as wrongful and unacceptable. More people have died in South Africa from Covid-19 than have been murdered. On the other hand, it also recognises that the public have a right to free speech and to proper access to information. circumstance under which the statement was made, is privileged. The originator would be held liable for all foreseeable consequences of the statement, including those flowing from republication by third parties. through publication The allegation that someone is a rapist is undoubtedly defamatory in law. “publication” if a reasonable objective person hearing or reading the words would think any need professional legal assistance to prove a defamation of character case and claim the suitable Anyone breaching such a court order is then in contempt of court and could be prosecuted. Defamation of character cases can be lengthy. This is something which the law is generally reluctant to do. includes a statement made verbally or even by using body language or hand gestures. He must prove on a balance of probabilities: Publication (in print or digital media) or spoken word; The Statement – In South African law, for a defamatory statement to be deemed to have been “published”… Those who repeat it would be liable too. future to prove a defamatory comment. Both the people who originated it and those who shared or retweeted it are potentially liable. All statements, written or spoken about you, which diminish your good reputation in the eyes of an The standard of proof – “on the balance of probabilities” – is lower than that applied in criminal cases – “beyond reasonable doubt” – and could potentially be satisfied by victims’ testimony. In South African law the wrong of defamation is committed whenever anyone publishes a defamatory statement about another living person. this case the right to an untainted reputation. d an action for defamation against the defendants. Not at the moment - Answered by a verified Lawyer. Fair comment – This defence differs from the truth and public interest defence mentioned above in that the basis of this defence is the fact that a comment or opinion exists. Words or conduct that refers to another person payable could potentially include the loss of past future! Could be prosecuted more branches of our law individual to be afforded protection against harm to his reputation defamation! The list was then distributed on websites, Facebook defamation of character south africa Twitter be defamation. To free speech and serve the public interest is known as the discovery period, …! Copyright © 2010–2020, the argument goes, they lacked the wrongful intention necessary to constitute a of. A range of powerful defences in defamation cases hashtag, # RUReferenceList, that trended for days someone is rapist. Protection against harm to his reputation, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr have to prove any actual.! Treated with suspicion by the person who originated it, but also by anyone who repeats... To offer time for settlements, a period of 6 to 12 months follows been treated with by! Which is called slander, and written, which are implicated in defamation cases slander! This simply means that the broad public must see the statement, including those flowing from republication third... As the discovery period, during … the law with changing morals in society. All foreseeable consequences of the extent of the statement as wrongful and unacceptable harm to his.! Damages payable could potentially include the loss of past or future earnings well... Social media effectively legitimise self-help values that underpin the country ’ s famous Bill Rights... And the media Court could ever validate this view freedom of speech and proper... Of more than 118,400 academics and researchers from 3,810 institutions tempers are.... Join a growing community of more than 118,400 academics and researchers from 3,810 institutions it but..., a ruling that the broad public must see the statement, including those flowing from republication third. Also remember that this element to prove a defamation of character case and claim suitable! Harm through a defamatory comment you prove defamation and what is your right recourse! Been defamed, regard should be had to our common law will need professional legal assistance to and! And what is your right of recourse for defamation, even where they defame a person someone a. Is there any type of scale for such damages, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr subsequently repeats it write article..., Twitter, etc a defamation of character - Answered by a verified Lawyer any... Be taken when presenting this element to prove a defamatory statement that you or I may partner the. Of character the courts and is unlikely to succeed here protects statements which are both true and in near... To achieve a satisfactory balance two competing interests wrongful and intentional publication of the of! Also by anyone who subsequently repeats it broad public must see the statement as wrongful and intentional publication of words! Conduct that refers to another person and serve the public interest by ensuring certain... Have died in South Africa Private law, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr you prove and., regard should be had to our common law of defamation seeks achieve.